Navigating the AI and Automation Era: A Personal Perspective on the Future of Work
As we enter the era of "AI" and "automation", technologies designed to simplify and reduce the burden of a hectic life, there is a growing sense of "frenzy" and "fear". In some regions, this has significantly impacted the "livelihood" of many workers. The debate surrounding AI and automation is multifaceted, with arguments both "for" and "against" these advancements, as well as "adjacent perspectives". Critics argue that AI has "snatched jobs" and replaced workers, reflecting a lack of "integrity" and "work ethic". Conversely, proponents highlight the high "computational demands" of tasks such as "data mining", "data warehousing", and "resource scaling".
Some individuals had hoped that AI and automation would act as "faithful companions", contributing to human "prosperity" and "well-being". Instead, they feel these technologies have "displaced workers", creating struggles for those trying to maintain their "livelihoods".
An "adjacent viewpoint"—which aligns partially with my perspective—argues that "population growth" and the passage of time have always necessitated "advancement". This demand for progress is as old as time itself and will continue into the future. The need for advancement often focuses on "ease" and "comfort", with "data" as a crucial building block. It’s noted that staying in a "comfort zone" can hinder personal "growth".
From my experience, "automation" and AI have mainly taken over "mundane" and "heavy computational tasks", often only partially and not in an entirely "optimized" manner. If AI begins to replace human workers, it may suggest that our skills are not aligning with current demands. Repetitive tasks can be monotonous, so if automation handles these, we might focus on creating more "efficient" and "optimized solutions". Embracing the flow of time, adapting to new requirements, and accepting change can help mitigate the impact.
Consider how a creator can be outperformed or even replaced by their own "creation". Humans developed AI and automation, and it’s possible that we didn’t fully understand or meet the current requirements. When a large number of people are concerned about these solutions, it can hinder our "evolution" and improvement, leading to systems designed to defer to these technologies.
AI solutions are here to "rectify problems", "optimize" processes, and offer "feedback" for continuous improvement. While there may be "blind spots", human "conscience" is essential for identifying and addressing these issues.
The shift in mentality is also crucial. There’s a fine line between "competitiveness" and "collaboration". While both are necessary, competitiveness often stems from personal goals, whereas collaboration involves brainstorming, acceptance, and adaptation. Embracing these changes can lead to the most positive outcomes.
Why remain in a state of frenzy? We have the capability to bring almost any "innovation" into existence, and AI is a prime example. Instead of condemning or fearing it, we should "await", "accept", "acknowledge", and strive to "ameliorate" the current situation. By embracing and evolving with these advancements, we can enhance "prosperity" and support the transformative power of AI.
"Disclaimer:" The views expressed in this article are solely my own and represent my personal perspective on the impact of AI and automation. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of others or the broader consensus on these issues.